home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
mac
/
ILLUSION
/
SROCK_TX.CXT
/
00330_Text_ref15bt.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
50 lines
Most of the facts about the
Poggendorff illusion, however,
can be explained by the depth-
processing theory, as Barbara
Gillam has ingeniously argued.
She believes that this illusion,
like the Ponzo illusion, arises
from the tendency of the
perceptual system to process
the figure as a representation
of a three-dimensional scene,
not as a pattern in two
dimensions. The figure to the
left makes this process
abundantly clear. The oblique
lines are processed as edges in a
horizontal plane. The angles
formed between the vertical
and oblique lines are
interpreted as right angles.
According to this theory, all
angles are misperceived: Acute
angles are overestimated and
obtuse angles are
underestimated. But
misperception of angle has a
very different meaning here:
The misperception is one of
perspective representation, not
of two-dimensional distortion.
In fact, except for the special
case of contours in a frontal
plane, right angles in the
environment will project to the
eye as either acute or obtuse
angles. Thus, for example,
rectangular objects project
trapezoidal images, none of the
angles of which are right
angles. This is one of the major
distortions that occurs in the
projection of objects in the
world to the eye. The reason
that the oblique lines in the
Poggendorff figure appear
misaligned is that they seem to
belong to two different planes
(i.e., planes at different
heights in the scene).